Another knowledge product from Chaco Canyon Consulting specially designed for busy people…
How to Spot a Troubled Project Before the Trouble Starts
by Richard Brenner
Projects never go quite as planned. We expect that, but we don't expect disaster. How can we get
better at spotting disaster when there's still time to prevent it?
Skip to the Details: How To Order
roject failures — even project disasters — are much more common than most of us realize,
because most failures are concealed by the facts that the project was completed, and that it accomplished more or less what
we thought it would. The projects that fail utterly, and end in cancellation, are the obvious disasters. But most troubled
projects are hidden. Finding them while there's still time to avert the trouble, and then preventing trouble or extricating
these projects from trouble, can make a big difference in organizational performance.
Hidden disasters were disasters financially, because they ran over budget, or they were completed late, or both. Other
disasters perhaps were completed on time and on budget, but only at the expense of other projects, which were stripped of
talent at critical times. And some disasters were on time and on budget, but never led to the market success they originally
promised.
How to Spot a Troubled Project Before the Trouble Starts tells you how to identify disasters — both hidden and obvious — before they become disasters. Written
specifically for the executive and senior manager, it tells you how to read a project, to determine what secrets might
lie beneath its tranquil surface. Armed with these techniques you not only can prevent projects from becoming disasters
themselves, but you can also prevent projects from wrecking your organization.
Most important, you'll be able to identify troubled projects while there is still time to fix them or cancel them
with minimal waste of resources.
Who can benefit
How to Spot a Troubled Project Before the Trouble Starts addresses a broad readership:
- Organizational leaders who want to set organizational policy to maximize the success of all projects
- Senior managers who want to guide sponsors and leaders of project teams within their organizations
- Sponsors of projects who want better results faster
- Managers of project managers
What you do with it depends on your role in your organization. Here are just a few ideas:
- Organizational leaders
- Use the booklet as part of a program for enhancing your organization's sophistication with respect to project
disasters. Pick and choose ideas, add your own insights, and examine organizational policy for ways to tighten
project creation and management practice, and for ways to enhance and focus monitoring. Or have us
customize the booklet to your organization to create training and reference materials for executives, senior
managers, sponsors, auditors and project managers.
- Senior managers
- Whether managing a crisis or creating a risk management plan, understanding the problems and pitfalls of the project
management helps you deliver a successful project or operate with enhanced predictability. By focusing your attention
on the right projects, early in the unfolding of failure, you can intervene when needed and only when needed.
- Sponsors of projects
- Sponsors are uniquely positioned either to create disaster or to prevent it. They act as an important part of the
interface between the project and and the rest of the organization, arranging for resources, championing the project,
and curtailing project excesses. Finding the balance is critical, and this booklet provides essential guidance.
- Managers of project managers
- Managers of project managers, or leads of project management offices, can also benefit from How to Spot a Troubled Project Before the Trouble Starts.
They can advise project managers about high-risk practices; advise senior managers about policy that supports risk
reduction; and help devise reporting mechanisms to focus monitoring and auditing activities to increase risk identification
efficiency.
Some sample tips
- Be alert when the budget for contingencies was driven down during initial negotiations
- If the project manager or risk manager presented a budget for contingencies, and that budget was driven down in
negotiations with the sponsor, the customer, Marketing, Sales, or management, take care. It's possible that the project
manager or risk manager yielded under the weight of superior political clout. The true cost of those contingencies
is probably closer to the proposed number than it is to the number that emerged from negotiations.
- To limit repetitions of this sort of thing, collect data about negotiations. Let everyone know that it's OK to
negotiate, and it's OK to make these adjustments, but the adjustments must be included in a Negotiation Report. That
alone might deter some from using political clout to arrive at unrealistic results.
- You can then create software to automatically alert internal troubled-project monitors to flag
the project, even in cases where deterrence isn't achieved.
- Beware projects with a high incidence of split assignments
- An individual has a split assignment when he or she is working on two or more projects, and is responsible to two
or more different project leads. If this practice is widespread in your organization, it could mean that there are too
many projects active at once. It could also mean that there is a shortage of people with particular skills. In either
case, the projects that share people are at risk, for three reasons.
- First, if trouble arises in one project, in the area covered by the split team member, the other
project(s) will temporarily have to make do with a reduced level of services of the split team member. This might work
out, but there is a finite chance that trouble will hit more than one of these projects simultaneously.
- Second, it's unlikely that the project leads who share team members have enough schedule control
or flexibility to avoid contending for the split team members simultaneously. Even if they do have such flexibility,
they have to discuss and compare schedules, which takes time that many don't want to use, given the low likelihood of a
good outcome.
- Finally, split assignments are usually arranged so that the split person's total effort summed
over all projects is 100%. But that's unrealistic. The splitting itself costs time. A good rule of thumb is 5% per
project. Thus, a person shared by two projects is only 90% available.
- And split assignments have subtle effects on the level of trust in the organization — they tend to
erode trust. In projects where trust is very important (example: dispersed or virtual teams), this effect can create both
unrecognized cost and unanticipated risk to the project.
- More info on split assignments.
- Be alert to financial trouble at bet-the-ranch suppliers
- When a project relies on elements delivered through an outsource arrangement, and when the vendor is severely
extended and in trouble, that project must be considered at risk, even if all is well in terms of schedule and budget.
Project leads who do not monitor the financial health of such vendors are flying blind and without instruments.
- When a project contracts with a vendor, and when that project is a stretch for that vendor, the
situation calls for an elevated level of risk monitoring by the project lead and sponsor. Have the project lead set an
appropriate Google Alert for the supplier, key locations for that
supplier, and all key personnel of that supplier.
Table of contents
Click the folder icons to reveal (or hide) chapter content summaries.
Reveal all chapter content summaries.
Introduction
Workplace politics
- Two organizational heavyweights are at war
- The denial/compliance cycle
- The current project lead didn't devise the current project plan
- Early scope creep
- The usual designated winners are in charge
- Emigration of designated winners
- Sponsor anxiety
Project management practice
- Project vision statement addresses the wrong audience
- Project plan contains no definition of "we're in trouble"
- The requirements were supposed to be stable by now, but they aren't
- Confused team meetings
- Risk plan fossilization
- Lack of consensus about the risk plan
- Lip service to the open issues list
- Long gaps between scheduled milestones
- Limited use of checklists
- Deadlines are redefined only after they're obviously impossible
- People write progress reports, but rarely are they read
- Late downscoping
- Intraproject communication is ineffective
- Upward trend (or spike) in cell phone minutes
- A dispersed project has tasks that span site boundaries
- Critical documents weren't professionally translated for offshore units
- A dispersed project team lacks a formal communications plan
- Lack of a defined process for project turnarounds
- Failure to conduct retrospectives
Organizational issues
- Lack of coordination between project teams and internal service departments
- We exported onto the project the consequences of executive and board room delays
- The organization has undertaken process change without replanning projects
- The project team has outdated or inadequate equipment and tools
- We changed some of the tools they use without replanning the project
- The budget for contingencies was driven down
- The schedule assumes full-time availability of all team members
- The schedule assumes overtime
- High incidence of split assignments
- Gross asymmetry in a critical split assignment
- The project lead has three or more projects to lead
- The project plan was overconstrained
- Travel budgets were cut below what a dispersed project originally proposed
- For bet-the-ranch projects, unexpected defection of cognizant management
- Financial trouble of bet-the-ranch suppliers
- The contract is under renegotiation
- The project manager is a contractor
- The project manager is formally a hands-on project manager
- The project manager isn't hands-on, but has only hands-on experience
Projects with internal customers
- The principal champion is one of the developers
- The schedule was specified mostly as a cost control device
- The schedule was determined by the need for revenue
- The sponsor resists stabilizing the requirements
- The customer doesn't acknowledge the need for rational project management
- A pattern of resource yanking
Projects with external customers
- The price was quoted before the requirements were defined
- The price was quoted without a real estimate
- The price quoted was significantly less than the project manager's estimate
- The customer resists participation in necessary decisions
- Client staff argue among themselves during meetings
- Relationships between client leadership and client staff are breaking down
- Turnover in the client project lead position
- Customer demands modification (or abandonment) of your customary working process
- Customer initiates contract amendment
- Customer is taking longer and longer to pay invoices
Human behavior
- The high priests are the only ones with a clue
- Project meeting absenteeism
- Late attendance at meetings or early departures
- Sudden increase in meetings centered around one particular subtask
- Overtime is mandatory
- Burnout
- Red flags on the morale flagpole
- High nose count of elephants in the room
- Difficulty finding volunteers
- Sudden increase (or steady uptrend) in emigration per capita
- High density of warm bodies
- Closely held information
- Downside surprises
- They didn't (don't) celebrate their successes
- Passion deficit at the top
- Nobody answers the doorbell
- Sudden drop in the ratio of bad news to good
- A trend of increasing (or a spike in) vending machine sales per capita
- A trend of increasing (or a spike in) off-hours headcount
Defects in deliverables
- Quality Assurance reports to the same organization that does the work
- The testing cycle has been shortened
- See no evil
- Defect denial
- Failure to categorize defects
- Patterns of defect reclassification
- Zero defects
What readers say
Here's a sample of reader's comments:
- You're stuff is brilliant! And -- Thank you for sharing these ideas.
- You and Scott Adams both secretly work here, right?
- The articles are great, I enjoy getting them, and you always have something very interesting to say, or good points
to raise.
- I really enjoy my weekly newsletters. I appreciate that the newsletter is a quick read and is much more
intellectually stimulating than, say, reading a Dilbert cartoon.
- You fill a need that went unmet -- a sort of Dr. Phil for Management!
- I have found your articles extremely accurate, inspiring and applicable to day-to-day. You have a great writing
style and the lessons that you have shared with us are invaluable.
- More
Designed for busy people
Most of us have way too much to do to find much time to read. And the time we do have is broken up into small
chunks. We need the knowledge, but too often, we don't have
time to get it, and we can't wade through 15-page chapters that lay out lengthy discussions.
Knowledge products from Chaco Canyon Consulting are designed with busy people in mind.
Here are some features that make reading our e-books fast and convenient.
- They're available on line
- It's fun to go to a bookstore, but you have to find the time to go to the store, find what you want, wait in line to pay for it,
and get back from the store. For some of us, all that time is a challenge.
- With our knowledge products, you browse for your selection on line, and pay for it quickly and
easily through ClickBank. You can do it anywhere that has an Internet connection.
- Instant downloads
- With some on-line stores, you have to wait for an email message with download instructions. The wait can be brief, but sometimes
it's a day or so.
- With our knowledge products, receive download instructions instantly. After you select an item, you can
have it in your possession in minutes.
- Universal data formats
- To use some on-line knowledge products, even those you download, you need a computer, or worse—a computer with a specific
operating system.
- Our knowledge products are available in near-universal formats—either hypertext (like this document you're
reading right now), or Acrobat (PDF), or MP3. You can use them with any computer or PDA that supports the format of that product (either
hypertext, PDF or MP3).
- Written for busy people
- Most business books are about 200-250 pages, with about 10 chapters.
I don't know about you, but I don't have time to read a 225-page book cover-to-cover. There are lots of folks like
us—that's why there's such a booming market in book condensations.
- Our ebooks cut out that middle step. They're designed to be read by people who don't have time for
the typical business book. Our tip books consist of short paragraphs, two- to four sentences per tip. Each tip has a headline in bold.
You can easily scan the book for tips that seem relevant to you and read only those. Read in any order, and read them in
short sittings.
- We use hyperlinks
- Most books, even e-books, are meant to be read off-line. Because they stand alone, they contain material that
you might not want to see.
- Our ebooks assume that you have the Internet nearby. If you want background material on a point we've made,
just click. And some of our hyperlinks link to other places in the e-book itself, to help you tie things together is you read.
Details and how to order
After your purchase is approved, ClickBank presents a page that contains a link to a page where you can download your item immediately.This item requires the Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or later or Adobe Acrobat 5.0 or later.You can load it onto your computer, your smartphone, or your iPad or PDA. Or print it on any standard black-and-white or color printer. Your satisfaction is guaranteed by ClickBank's return policy.
Price: USD 19.95 per copy.
Quantity packs are available at the prices shown below.
Call for site license pricing at the phone number below.
Order "How to Spot a Troubled Project Before the Trouble Starts" by credit card, for USD 19.95 each, using ClickBank.com. . |