Super-reasonable organizational coping emphasizes Context,
usually through a devotion to "objectivity" and at
the expense of human considerations or considerations of relationship.
Super-reasonable coping can lead an organization to adopt self-destructive
strategies simply because they make sense for the "bottom
line," or because they emphasize some specific organizational
priorities, even if they're self-destructive.
This is a portion of an essay on Organizational
Coping Patterns — patterns of organizational behavior relative
to stressful, challenging situations.
hen an organization adopts a Super-reasonable
coping stance in a given situation, it's taking context into
account, but at the same time it might be failing to take account
of its Self and any Other person or organization in that situation.
To mask any feelings, super-reasonable organizations use big
words and lots of technical jargon and acronyms. For example,
faced with the Year 2000 problem, the organization that copes
Super-reasonably might announce in April 1999 that all employees
of the Help Desk organization must report for work at 10 PM December
31, 1999, for a 10 hour shift. The announcement would be made
in a terse memo that has a very reasonable, bureaucratic tone.
This approach to the problem seems logical, taking the emergency
into account, but displays total disregard for the personal needs
of the Help Desk staff. Moreover, it could cause them to leave
the company in July, or to transfer within the company to other
positions, thus damaging the organization itself.
A common feature of Super-reasonable coping
is the sense of loss of objective that sometimes happens when
we listen to a long, intricate logical argument. It makes sense
at each step along the way, but soon we get a feeling of "Where
is this headed? Are we ever going to reach a conclusion?"
I call this form of Super-reasonableness "Lost in a sea
of logic." Or if the organization does reach a conclusion,
it fails to meet some basic tests of common sense — it fails
to account for the people needs. I call this form of Super-reasonableness
the "HAL-9000" form.
Lost in a sea of logic
In this form, the organization thinks something
to death. This is perhaps the form that causes an organization
to commission a task force to study a problem, even if the problem
is three years old, and has been task-forced before. When the
task force completes its report, nothing happens, in part because
the report is too long and complex for anyone to understand.
Instead of grappling with the problem, the organization just
thinks about the problem. It applies reason as a coping strategy,
rather than as a tool to address the problem.
HAL-9000
In the Help Desk example above, it's easy to
see why somebody might believe that having staff on duty on New
Year's Eve might be a good idea. But this plan just won't work,
because it doesn't consider the basic needs of people. Moreover,
by announcing the policy in April, management gives the staff
plenty of time to look for new jobs. A plan that might work would
be anything that was structured to make employees want
to report to work, or at least be nearby and sober — for example,
a free New Year's Party, with overnight accommodations. No alcohol,
of course.
Super-Reasonable Vignette
The Super-Reasonable Configuration
How would
the emergency
project situation unfold in a Super-Reasonable organization?
We might hear questions and comments such as:
I think we ought to create a subcommittee to look at our
options. The problem is too complex for us to solve it here.
Who's interested in heading up the committee? Can we have someone
to volunteer to form a task force by the time we meet next week?
When someone objects, "Haven't we studied this problem
before?", we might hear this retort: "Not really, things
are very different now. We have a new vendor, the Cross-connect
Assembly has been redesigned, and there have been extensive upgrades
in the Firmware. It's a whole new ball game. We need to take
a fresh look at this."
If your estimates are correct, and we need another 13.3 man-months
to get this work done, we can finish it by June 12 if everyone
works 52.5 hours per week between now and then, and if we reduce
lunch breaks from 45 minutes to 35 minutes. Oh and we have to
cancel the department picnic.
From Super- Reasonableness to Congruence
To move a group from a Super-Reasonable stance, in which only
Context is taken into account, you must bring them to a place
where they can see Self and Other. From that vantage point, they
might see something about the organization, or about themselves,
that might be difficult to accept. In our emergency example,
it might be difficult to accept that the customer or sponsor
has a right to know about possible (or even inevitable) delays,
for their own planning purposes. The difficulty might come about
because informing the sponsor/customer entails admitting that
the organization has failed to meet its plan. That failure could
cause some in the organization to feel that they have failed
personally, even when it's plain that the failure is the organization's
alone.
To help the organization face the situation, avoid accepting
any delaying tactics, such as further study. Instead, ask what
will be done with the outcome of the study. "What will we
do if we find that we must announce a slip?" In other words,
ask the hypothetical question that deals with the most negative
possible result. Any unwillingness to deal with these hypotheticals
is equivalent to a refusal to plan, which is anathema to the
Super-reasonable position — refusal to plan is unreasonable.
If you succeed in bringing the group to plan for the worst case,
they might be led to address the details of the consequences
for Self and Other, the missing elements that are needed for
Congruence. Top
Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline?
Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info
In October, increase awareness of workplace politics, and learn how to convert destructive politics to creative politics. Order the Workplace Politics Awareness Month Kit during October at the special price of USD 29.95 and save USD 10.00! Check it out!
Your ad can appear here. It can contain active links to your site or landing page, and you can select the page and placement that best meets your needs.
Are you doing work you love? Are you less in love with the job? Bad boss, long commute, troubling ethical questions, hateful colleague? Read Go For It! Sometimes It's Easier If You Run to learn what we can do when we love the work but not the job. It helps you get moving again!
Are your projects always late and over budget? Are your project teams plagued by turnover, burnout, and high defect rates? Turn your culture around. Read 52 Tips for Leaders of Project-Oriented Organizations, filled with tips & techniques for organizational leaders. Check it out!
Are you fed up with tense, explosive meetings? Are you or a colleague targets of a bully? Read 101 Tips for Managing Conflict to learn how to make peace with conflict. Check it out!
Do you ever wonder if all these meetings are really necessary? (They aren't) Or whether there isn't some better way to get this work done? (There is) Read 101 Tips for Effective Meetings to learn how to make meetings more productive — and more rare. Check it out!